Rent Regulation


As an Owner or Operator, How Does this Affect My Business?

Currently, 36 states preempt local governments from adopting rent regulation laws and only the District of Columbia, New York, and Oregon along with cities and towns in California,  New Jersey, and Maryland have rent control or rent stabilization policies in place. However as housing instability and tenant displacement concerns gain more attention, local governments are increasingly pushing back on preemption laws and considering adoption of these restrictions. 

While each jurisdiction’s rent control regime is slightly different, their laws and regulatory frameworks often perform similar functions. With taxpayer funding, they establish a local rent board to administer the program and regulate enforcement. They govern the amount and frequency of rent increases, require an approval process for special assessments to cover repairs or major capital improvements, and allow for decontrol of a rent-regulated unit upon vacancy or exceptions for new construction. Also, rent control policies are often coupled with just cause eviction measures or other restrictions that severely limit the ability of an owner to manage rental communities effectively. 

NAA Position

Rent control distorts the housing market by acting as a deterrent and disincentive to develop rental housing, and expedites the deterioration of existing housing stock. While done under the guise of preserving affordable housing, the policy hurts the very community it purports to help by limiting accessibility and affordability.


To learn more about rent control issue, please contact Government Affairs